More on Salon
Shift published an article last June about Salon.com, claiming that its decline is due in part to the disappearance of serious investigative reporting. I know this was an important part of the site, but this is not what kept me going to Salon. My « relationship » with this site was of a much more personal nature. The editors just seemed to read my mind. Where else can I find articles like these (all published recently):
1) Keen on Keener
I really enjoy Catherine Keener as an actress. I loved her in Walking and Talking, where she played a girl who can’t get a boyfriend (a great rental, by the way). But she really surprised me with her role as the strong and selfish Maxine in Being John Malkovich. Finally someone understood how sexy this woman is! She was also great in the recent Lovely & Amazing, as an unhappy housewife/artist who has a funny, short lived crush with a 17 year old guy from the one-hour photo store.
Salon just published a short piece on Keener, who never seems to get the press she deserves. It’s an opinion piece. You don’t learn much from reading it, you might not agree with the author’s opinion on the actress but still, you feel like you just had a conversation with a witty, smart friend you like to argue with.
2) I wanna hold your hand
I was shocked when I read this sexy article about the beauty of men’s hands because I’ve been meaning to write/film something about the same subject for a couple of years now. This author beat me to it (and probably a lot more women before her), but it was such a nice surprise and a good read that I couldn’t be disappointed. And I’ll still write on the subject of men’s hands later…
3) Sexy specs
I’ve already mentioned this article about women who wear glasses in this blog, and the search string « geek girls wearing glasses » is still what brings the most new visitors to my site. There seems to be a lot of people out there having a fetish about women who wear glasses and even though the Salon author Charles Taylor wrote a personal story on the subject, he somehow hit a collective nerve.
I guess that should be enough for me to renew my subscription to Salon, but I think all of these articles where available to the general public, and not only to members. Sometimes I wonder if the editors truly know what is good about their site. Maybe Web readers are too much of a diverse bunch to be truly analyzed and understood.
Strangely, these three articles were published in the sex section. Does it reveal something about me or something about the editors of Salon?